HAPPINESS IS NOW
To ask when we can have happiness and under what conditions, is to not know happiness, as happiness has no basis in time and is not conditional. ‘When’ is not an appropriate question to ask, ever. To ‘seek’ happiness in time, is to look away from happiness. To find the source of happiness, is to 
Happiness Is present as It is Presence Being. There is no getting happiness as it is not a gift or an object. It cannot be given as It Is everywhere/nowhere. Meaning that our True Nature is Happiness located everywhere while never being found anywhere. It cannot be found and cannot be ignored. It Is.
Whether ‘we’ realize it or not, happiness is always Present. It’s current form is formless but can be seemingly corralled by experientially feeling our ‘aliveness’, that is permanent and fresh as freshness can be. It is the subtle movement of energy moving within us and outside of us -actually not respecting any boundaries, to include the closed body/mind idea.
Happiness cannot be found in the past or the future, as those timezones cannot contain the vibrance of happiness. The non-Now bandwidth is too distorted and small to contain all ‘that’. The modulation of past/future as seeming reality, is only tragically reductive. The ‘aliveness’ is just not there.
If happiness is always Present, how could an event or experience say that it was the cause?!
That assumption of controlling happiness is an absurdity. The permanence of happiness precludes events and experiences of defining limitations to what is unlimited. For happiness to appear in starts and fits, is not to have clarity as to what happiness Is. Happiness Is always abiding no matter what our protestations are and how hard we yell them.
Happiness Is the immutable Priorness to the dreaming and seeming of so-called reality. The aliveness and joy of happiness is a permanent feature of the 
In other words, happiness is the starting/end point of even dreaming, but happiness never really starts or stops in the dream. Like the ’Now’, it is not linear like time. ‘Time’ is after the ’Now’ but ‘time’ is still inundated with the ’Now’. To separate happiness from the ’Now’ is to not understand Fullness. The separateness is only there in duality with the help of time.
Happiness Is, unabashed. It is the field of Being everything. To start every single moment from ‘Us’ (this field), is to be constantly coursing happiness with an authenticity that is so alive, it naturally attracts more of the same. The liberation is the knowing of ‘this’ happiness is accessible everywhere and at all times and places, as effortlessly as Being ‘Us’.
“Our Self, Awareness, is like an open, empty, allowing space. As such, we resist nothing, hold nothing, seek nothing. Thus, happiness is our essential nature.” -Rupert Spira 
Appearing
REACHING FOR SHINY OBJECTS
REACHING FOR SHINY OBJECTS Aura Man.m4v
Everything is Divining.
The full acceptance of “What Is”, is total immersion in the Divine. To not have one preference in any direction, other than knowing the Knowing, is to clearly See the Being of Being. Meaning there is no ‘other’ where disenfranchised energy can wander to.
Acceptance of the “What Is” is not true acceptance, when 50%, 75%, or even 90% of what our understanding is, is filtered through dross. Partial preferences are not viable. Any viability based on an illusory figure, is illusory. When we give any illusion reality, it steals the show.
Unfortunately, it doesn’t take a whole lot to distort Truth, when Truth cannot truly be Truth and contemporaneously be an object. Mis-placement of honoring a one-dimensional ‘idea’ as Truth, deprives us of experiencing Fullness as un-conditional.
The torture of suffering abides easily when we unknowingly misrepresent Consciousness as second to the world and to our mind/body. This is the objectification of Consciousness, i.e. a ‘thing’.
Consciousness, precedes any noun-ing to include the body/mind, perceptions, sensations, feelings, and thoughts. The no-thing-ness of Consciousness is a reference to the emptiness of infinite potential that precedes any thing or noun-making. The elemental problem is often the assumption that we can find Consciousness like any other noun.
What is looking, feeling, tasting, touching, hearing, is the forgotten witness of conscious contact. Forgotten because of It’s eternal ubiquity and non-nouning. What is perceiving, cannot be known like a noun can be known. The knowing of Knowing is independent of any phenomena. That Knowing is eternally Present and independent of acknowledgement or un-acknowledgement. ‘It’ Is the eternal witness witnessing thought-less-ly.
Being aware of “What Is”, is Knowing. It Is Knowing Self (verbing) with no other (noun). Being aware of the Knowing has no need for nouns or objects. Being aware of objects is being aware of phenomena arising from Consciousness Itself. Consciousness has no identity in that there is no noun to identify with.
When we reach for the shiny objects, aka thoughts, we invest in the dross not the substance of life. The act of reaching and claiming the shiny object is the beginning of the mis-identification and concretion of false self. The repetition is necessary to sustain the illusion that really has no life at all.
Losing the false identity, as the source of consciousness, is finding Consciousness as only Consciousness. Consciousness starts and ends with Consciousness, meaning there is never any ‘thing’ to ever find. What appears in Consciousness is not sustainable except through Consciousness and It’s play. The Dreaming dreams the dream. The screen allows the movie to play. The screen is first, the movie is temporarily second.
“Don’t lose yourself in thoughts and feelings; let them lose themselves in you.” -Rupert Spira
We Are the ‘no beginning’ and ‘no end’ of 
Consciousness ad infinitum.
Love the Love, Daddy’O
LOVE LOVES LOVE
LOVE LOVES LOVE
There is no chooser. There is no choosing. There is no chosen. There is nobody to love.
There is only love.
Love is not choosing as there is no one to choose. The One is only One and not two.
And the body is merely a vehicle for Love to be broadcast. Loving the internet because of its broadcasting powers, is not necessary for it to work. Similarly, the vehicle is merely the medium used for transacting love. The vehicle needs the fuel of animation for it to work. Love needs nothing as It is everything.
The vehicle can be directed to operate in the traffic of phenomena. When the appearances of living phenomena arise, the felt sense of Love can be part of that ascendancy.
Though, Love remains Love regardless of what medium is used. Ramping up love is never necessary due to the fact that it can never be diminished.
The capacity of love seemingly differs among the human vehicles. The difference is not due to love itself modulating the quality and/or quantity of love.
The difference can be accounted for by the dreaming of the dream. Only in the dreaming of the unreal dream, does love suffer a loss or gain in the quantity/quality. And the dreaming is Love dreaming the dream. Love can seemingly be lost only in the dream.
The aliveness of what’s happening, is love reflecting It’s Presence in the appearance called life.
“To know the world is to be the world, and to be the world is to love the world.”-Rupert Spira
The multiplicity of vehicles does not result in a-division of love. Love remains full and undiminished.
Vehicle fleets may increase or decrease. The amount of inventory has no impact on having enough love.
Love does not grow or lessen with time. Time is a construct that was created through the prism of the mind. Again, the True nature of Love is always un-diminish-able. It’s wheelhouse Is Eternity.
The necessity to do a division of love is a false assumption with no merit. Love diminished is no longer love. There is no ‘doing’ Love. There is only Being Love.
Love cannot be divided except seemingly. Calling Love that is divided ‘Love’, is mislabeling what was supposed to be Love (unmolested).
There Is no changing the essential nature of Love as it is not a thing. Things are nouns. Love is an active verb, meaning Love Loves Love ad Infinitum.
Love was never created and can never die, unlike things.
Be Love, effortlessly. Effortlessly is allowing no differentiation. There is a full acceptance for everyone and everything as all Is Love.
Love the Love, Daddy’O
DYING TO LIVE
DYING TO LIVE
The desperation is unrelenting. Does it have to be so hard? Are there just short vacations between the onslaughts of strife? Is there a happiness that is not concluded with a termination date?
Are we just dying to live?
Are the goal posts moving farther out of reach as we approach? Can anything or anybody save this god- forsaken world? OR is our perspective all wrong?
The testing has been going on a long time without a seeming long-term solution. Dying sometimes appears to be the only relief.
Except, what dies is not the body/mind. What dies is the idea of being the body/mind.
When we so forcefully grab at reality for the ‘seeming self’, we unseemingly get attached/identified with the ‘seeming self’. This has been said and heard by us before. But do we realize that we completely missed the message?!
The pointing is not to the ’seeming self’. The message is to the permanent Self, from the permanent Self.
It is only with the death of the illusory self that real relief can be found. Concurrent with that death, is the complete divestment of our structured debt obligation, we have amassed in creation of this illusory self.
Our belief and conditioning in the illusory self cannot continue to abide , as it is ‘that’ that binds us to the false imprisonment.
The abandonment of the whole structure is necessary in order to be liberated from it’s influence. It’s influence, is our attachment to the thoughts, perceptions, sensations, and unidentified beliefs we recycle daily in our waking/sleeping moments.
All ‘that’ must die to live the aliveness that is always happening with complete freedom. What dies is illusion.
What is it the makes up illusion? Just illusion. Reality was never un-whole. It just appeared that way from a jaundiced view.
The death of an illusion need not be mourned, as it was only a seeming illusion. The Reality never suffers as It’s wholeness is never diminished by illusion. Illusion literally means nothing.
The point is that the starting point does NOT begin with the illusion. The starting point has never changed. The starting point has always been here and Now, as there is nothing else, including time, to say otherwise.
When we abide in the illusory and seeming self, we abide in illusion. This is because we dis-allow the ’Openness’ with our seeming need for following thoughts i.e. identification with thoughts as us.
Openness never pushes. Illusion constantly pushes. Openness is effortless acceptance, while the illusory self requires enormous maintenance as it is not even real.
Full acceptance versus a painful contraction of pushing, clearly distinguishes direction and starting point.
Resting as what is observing the illusion relieves the need to push. Appearances of thoughts, conditioning, memory, and identification are divested from the blind commitment that previously characterized one’s view.
The Openness allows without vetting, all comers and goers. The Openness is unaffected by what is perceived, as it Is the Perceiving only.
The appearances all have a short self-life. Illusions do not even have a shelf-life as they are imposters in time. They have never really existed. Their death was not even a death since they were never really born.
Abiding in a thought-based environment means that we believe in our little opinions, ideas, and predilections. Letting go of all that is necessary because the ‘m’ and ‘y’ in that, is what binds us to the illusion. When we free ourselves from this attachment we can easily accept the “What Is” effortlessly.
“All that is experienced is experience, but there is no independent self that experiences and no independent object, other or world that is experienced. There is just the experiencing of experience, and it is ‘experiencing’ that experiences experience.” -Rupert Spira
The Perceiving, the Openness, freely accepts life without the need to be the arbiter and/or dictator of life. Consciousness Is everything to include the starting and end point, as it is the same.
To live is to die first. What dies, can die. What lives, can’t die. See the effortless permanence that breathes life through us all, always. There is only Openness Perceiving Self. Rest here, watching the characters, appearances, and seeming dramas. This seat is the best seat in the theater.
Live life Here and Now.
Love the Love, Daddy’O
AWARENESS IS NOT A THOUGHT
AWARENESS IS NOT A THOUGHT
The mind is an object, as are the thoughts perseverated on by the mind. Objects do not have Consciousness, except in the sense that Consciousness has everything. Every ‘thing’ arises from Consciousness and abides in Consciousness.
The appearances of thought are appearances that do not have the permanence and stability of eternity existing as eternity.
When we talk about ‘Consciousness’, we stick a non-concept into a conceptual framework, compromising the ‘essential-ness’, for the convenience of the mind. To talk and conceptualize about ‘It’ is immediately imposing limitation/separation.
To suggest that ‘Awareness’ is not a thought, is to overtly underscore the frugality of continuing to use an inadequate structure called the ‘mind’, to do the calculus of infinity.
The pointing, is to the view of ‘what is’, not to the prototypical mind and it’s failed attempt to digest the indigestible.
Having a ‘thought’ about Awareness is always coming from the limited view of ‘thought’. Having Awareness about ‘thoughts’ is changing the view to substantially reducing the influence of ‘thoughts’ relative to using the ‘Prior-ness’ of Awareness.
Maintaining the view of thoughts as secondary, as a permanent view; reduces the falseness of self, gradually revealing Self as the Prior-ness to all thoughts.
Now, the presumed ‘thinker’ is no longer presumed, as there is no longer an imaginary object that produces thoughts, i.e. the thinker.
The ‘thinker’ never was real and never was really in control of thoughts, despite ‘the thinking’ that believed all that.
Thoughts arise from Consciousness and are later claimed by the mind with ‘m’ and ‘y’asserting a false self and ‘thinker’. The charade is merely conceptual belief.
Direct experience of the ‘Prior-ness’ , reveals a non-object. Awareness never falters in It’s Presence, as it Is the Conscious contact that Is Seeing, Tasting, Touching, Smelling, and Hearing effortlessly. These 5 gates are the conduits for the eternal ‘on’ of Awareness. Awareness is never ‘off’.
The artificial dominance of thought breaks up the ‘experiencing’. We over-value objects. Contrasting, ‘That’ which is aware of thoughts, and is receiving everything at full value, without any diminishing of Self. Identification with objects (thoughts) is mind-based. Thoughts and other appearances in Consciousness are very temporary visitors expressing their limited vocabulary, on the surface of this vast ocean.
To abide in the Ineffable Awareness, is to have the primary view of Awareness as the starting point of nothing and everything happening constantly. The intersection with objects and Awareness has no adverse effects on Awareness. The basis of objects is Awareness, making Awareness integrated and undiminished.
“See thoughts and feelings like a train that enters a station and then leaves; be like the station, not like a passenger.” -Rupert Spira
The perseverating of thoughts, clouds reality with concepts, missing the sum and substance of existential Being. Thoughts cannot be the conveyance to getting past the separate artificial self. Thoughts have gone too far away from Source to realize Source.
The Ineffable Source of Being/Knowing is always Present and is never diminished. ’That’ Is the conveyance that transports ‘Us’ to ‘Us’. The limited vocabulary of objects hides the obvious “I Am” which is not a thought.
Love the Love,
Daddy’O
AM I A ‘NOUN’ OR A ‘VERB’?
AM I A ‘NOUN’ OR A ‘VERB’?
That’s a peculiar question, but a relevant inquiry. It is peculiar in that we do not think about breaking down language to the point of how it’s use effects us -directly. It is relevant in that the ‘use’ presupposes an elemental framework with profound consequences. Albeit, consequences for a starting point called identity.
An inquiry must take place to properly assess the question. The question-er asks first, ‘who’ am I?
Secondly, the movement to place ‘self’ in the category of the stasis of a ’noun’ or in the constant movement of a ‘verb’, must subsequently fit the choice of the first question.
‘Not’ getting a proper fitting, ‘after’ christening self with a noun or a verb, will compel us to view the question again. If in the first choice, there is the finding of a failure to properly justify our appropriate slot, a ‘redo’ is in order. Given the rigors of the selected slot, it is intellectually commanded, to right an obvious irrational fitment.
If “Who am I”, is answered in the noun affirmative, where is the evidence?
A lifetime of a daily grind of conditioning, has left the clear majority of 7.5 billion people, most probably, in the slot of a ‘noun’. Even that number is not enough justification for noun-ing.
Often, the ‘character’ we most identify with, is still the character with the very specific limited role and accumulative historical narrative, that is ‘real’ in terms of worldly script-writing. As far as ‘true identity’ is concerned, ‘We’ as ‘Fullness’, are certainly ‘not’ just the character in this ‘real’ movie. The character we play is a ‘noun’. However, the ‘Fullness’ is prior to any noun-ing in any role or movie we play in.
This is where the confusion takes place. We do not distinguish the character we play with the ‘no-nouning’ aka ‘verbing’ of whom we really Are. Not distinguishing Self from a seemingly stable ‘noun’ is the mis-identity. The superficial role we play in life is not whom We really Are. There is a certain finality to being a noun, called limitation.
There is no limitation or any boundary in the domain of Nothing/Everything-ness. There is no location or point to find ‘this’ unboundedness, although It Is all points/locations.
If ‘It’ were a noun, then we could find the noun, see the noun, and consider it an ‘object’. No noun-ing is no subject/object. The duality is appearance not the Priorness of infinite potential.
“Be neither the knower nor the known, but rather the knowing of experience, and you will find yourself as everyone and everything.” -Rupert Spira
A ‘noun’ has a finality of finished limitation. Verbing is never finished. Verbing is not setting down as subject/object. Identity is much closer to a verb despite the ‘seeming’ ‘noun-ing’. This type of identity is not stuck in ‘this’ or ‘that’. ‘It’ never settles for any ‘thing’. The nature of Beingness is an aliveness that is refreshing Itself constantly. Becoming a ‘noun’ stops the eternal Becoming.
The ‘aliveness’ is the Now, the Moment in the moment, that accepts the perennial change with Love coming home to the Heart. The ‘aliveness’ is alive because there is no clinging to any ‘thing’ (or noun). It Is free as free can be because there is never any stopping the eternity of Being.
Resting as a ‘noun’ is not resting. It is rusting. Resting as a ‘verb’ is refreshing and rejuvenating as there is nothing to rust.
The boundaries of a ‘noun’ identity are prison-like in that we are compelled to believe something that is not true, resulting in suffering. Being a limited noun traps us in a separate illusory identity compelling us to believe in the limited capacity to transcend the prison of self. The verbing of Beingness has no stops or nouns, thereby making self-imprisonment an impossibility. Beingness has nothing to believe as there is no noun there to have af.
Moreover, the ‘completeness’ of Beingness is not needy in the least ergo, Fullness. In Beingness, there is not even a need for identity, as It just Is. The ‘aliveness’ of no limits and all possibilities result in the Yes, Yes, and Yes of “What Is”.
Love the Love, Daddy’O
THE LUMINOSITY OF SELF
THE LUMINOSITY OF SELF
The Self of Awareness is luminous to Itself. The self of manufactured self is reflected and diminished luminance . The limitation on self as created object, is an imposition that is only indigenous to the dualistic self.
When self is a noun, then limitation shows up, as the verb-ing of Self cannot continue, in this distorted venue. I Awareness never really stops to become a noun, except ‘seemingly’ so. When noun-ing, Higher Self’s Stillness and Movement are limited to a single point in time which makes It in conflict with the True Nature of eternal Beingness.
The light of Awareness never actually diminishes but appears to seemingly indulge in this limitation.
When we broadcast from the belief of false self, we engage in the acting upon the premise of limitation. Nevertheless, Our True Nature remains unchanged and seemingly appears to be inaccessible. The “lens of me” covers up and clouds the brilliance of expressing and accessing the unlimited bandwidth of effortless Knowing/Being.
Conditioning and unchecked beliefs in identifying with body/mind, block the view called ’Seeing’. ’Seeing’ Self and separate self cannot be readily seen from the very singular view of only ‘me’. The ranting and constant raving about the needs of the separate self have hardened the heart.
The armoring is needed, as the fallacious noun cannot be revealed, lest the ‘idea’ of false self will expose the scam. Noun-ing is the one-trick pony that must occur constantly, in order to affirm an otherwise illusory nature. Ergo, the need for all that bandwidth.
The above falseness is an egregious load on the separate self. And this loading is completely unnecessary. The load is lifted by changing the view, Seeing the structured conditioning and Seeing Self incarnate.
Staying with the witnessing, is the knowledge that ‘this’ immersion will subsequently yield greater inculcation, and where full integration occurs resulting in effortlessness in Being being solidified.
Hanging out with ‘Luminosity’ full-time, has benefits. Letting go of the drag of dross has benefits. Changing the view is clearly a starting point for substantive reveals in Consciousness.
The reveal is the light of ‘Knowing’ seemingly turning on to open the door, which is ’no door’. The Luminosity was always there. The door was never really there. But now the view has changed.
“When we understand that what we deeply long for can never be found in an object, substance, activity, relationship or state, our longing naturally and effortlessly loses its direction and dynamism, flows back to its source, and is revealed as the happiness for which we were in search.” -Rupert Spira
The downloads occur when we tune in to the unseen frequencies of Self that are more real than any previous illusory idea we had about ‘things’. Before and behind ‘things’ is the ‘Isness’ of Our Being. Always Present Now.
Our Presence is always available at all times as We are always ‘Seeing’ all the time. Being with the ‘Seeing’ is ‘ Seeing’. The accessibility of ‘Seeing’ has never left Us for a second. The ‘leaving’ was only found in the separate self. The Ineffable formless Self Is everything and cannot leave. It Is the Sustainer.
“Seeing’ and ‘Knowing’ are only available from the luminosity of Self Itself.
Be ‘that’, effortlessly.
Love the Love, Daddy’O
YESTERDAY IS TODAY IS TOMORROW
YESTERDAY IS TODAY IS TOMORROW
Why do we demand to seek the differentiation of eternal time? Is the undifferentiated ’Now’ to be parsed to be useful? For functionality and seeming knowledge of ‘what’s happening’ do we do precisely that? The ‘lens’ of time is a ‘lens’ we often put in front of Our Seeing. Is that necessary? Will ‘Seeing’ decompose to a lesser state sans ‘lens’?
For functionality, timing is NOT optimized by putting the construct of time in front of Seeing. It is not that time isn’t useful in sorting out the phenomena of the action on the stage of life. It Is. It is good to ’stage timing’ to know when the script indicates appearance. But it is the Director that really calls the shots, script and/or ad lib.
The key is ‘where’ (and when) time falls in. If timing causes a failure to hear the Director’s silent direction, because ‘timing’ (past, present, future) was given first listen, then the play is at the mercy of the fictional character and becomes rudderless. Time is a conceptual tool, whose birth is clearly after Beingness (aka The Director). Being time itself, the Director’s cue is innate and perfectly executed.
The play of life needs ‘time’ only because it is the play of the phenomenological. ‘Time’ cannot be shoved down the mouth of eternity lest we immediately compromise eternity with finiteness. Eternity is unchangeable.
In the world where time is measured and allotted in increasing amounts of smaller bits, the accuracy of measurement only gets more sophisticated and precise due to tolerances of machinery and science demanding it. Cooling the atoms of an atomic clock to absolute zero is essentially an attempt to get to the deepest core of Being Itself, where nothing changes and eternity abides effortlessly.
Being “in the zone” is Being in time with eternity. Time stops. Timelessness frees the phenomena to be somewhat free of phenomena. And it all still happens in the seeming artifice of time. Time comes back but eternity never quits Being eternity. Ergo, ‘Eternity’ is always first priority and always the starting and end point.
The essential point being, to put the presumed importance of time before timelessness, is to not see clearly, the Director, and then to consequently and subsequently deride the script, with improper ad libs. Phenomenological timing is in harmony with eternal harmony when eternal harmony is sourced first as the base, with actions taken from that base. The Eternity, that is prior to the phenomenological atomic clock, is what the atomic clock is actually, ultimately, geared to.
When we ‘gear to’ the eternal atomic clock, we clearly acknowledge where optimal timing comes from. For the separate self to suggest that ‘it’ has optimal timing, is false identity personified.
Yesterday, today, and tomorrow are not true starting points, ever. They are time. Time is derivative of eternity. The Eternal is the source of true time (timelessness) and a perfect constant affirmation of all things phenomenal. The unity of constant affirmation gives an un-daunting harmony to enormous complexities, of which the Eternal Presence of Unity Consciousness is always fully abiding.
We Are only ever here now. We Are not the constructs we build. They service us. We do not service them.
By falsely referencing time as the first cause, concurrent with the further mis-identification with temporal forms, time is degraded at the outset.The contraction of identification with the forms of life is precisely that, a contraction. Separate self is a contraction of time and form, meaning, that it is not what is happening now. Fullness is timelessness just happening in the Now. What is happening does not need time and the separate self, to help in creating this harmony.
‘Stepping into Eternity’, is still ‘separateness’ in the act of stepping into something. There is no ‘stepping’ and there is no ‘something’. We already Are ‘that’ Eternity and We Are already ‘that’ Now. Always Now first, as ‘It’ Is.
“The ultimate truth of who you are is not I Am this or I am that, but I am.” -Eckhart Tolle
Love the Love Daddy’O
I AM HERE
I AM HERE
I Am Here Now.
No more needs to be known, as pining for knowledge of Self is futile. It is the mind’s attempt to grab at something to define ‘nothing’. That ‘Suchness’ is not reachable with the limited topped out capacity of mind.
True Self is not definable, at least not in the conceptual way of defining things. Because it is not definable, then throwing more knowledge at ‘It’, is futility incarnate.
Waiting for understanding to arise through the vehicle of ‘more’ knowledge, is an activity that, by it’s nature, is pure distraction from ‘just’ Being. It is getting caught by the shiny objects that presumably have glory in the overplayed hand of ‘presumed’ higher knowledge.
The higher knowledge that is Present is not the higher knowledge of the mind. The difference is that the mind continues to posit the falseness of ‘separateness’ or illusion in it’s definition of knowledge.
The illusion of separateness is operating on the downgrading of Reality Itself into the ‘dream’ of self. There is no ‘there’ there as the ‘dream’ has no ‘dreamer’, just the illusion of a ‘dreamer’. Additionally, the temporariness of the ‘dream’ is in another illusion called ‘time’.
The ‘knowledge’ that is there, is essentially there for the construction of the dream and to point back to the act of ‘Dreaming’, which is the permanence of True Knowledge and is undefinable, at least in ‘dream’ terms.
Consider our habit of sincerely wanting to think our way out of our lack of a deep enduring satisfaction. It is the same view, trying out different degrees of effort and commitment, to changing paths of knowledge we encounter. These knowledge pathways are born in the field of illusion. Their source code is fleeting, changing, and cannot be the ‘undefinable Truth’. These paths are inherently limited given the limited field that spawns them.
The ‘seeking’ always puts the mind in play. To ‘not’ seek is considered heretical to spirituality. But “What Is” would not be “What Is” if we had to seek it! “What Is” does not need ‘seeking’ to survive. “What Is” Is timelessly permanent. To add to ‘It’ is to subtract and obscure ‘It’.
There is a beautiful simplicity in Being Here Now as I Am. Adding things to ‘It’ does nothing to enhance It’s ‘Isness’. Acquired knowledge is another ‘thing’. Having a need to be liberated is an idea that is a direct assault
on the fact and experience of “What Is” and It’s nature of being Eternally Present.
Having a committed allegiance to an idea like personal liberation is analogous to not seeing the sun on a sunny day. There is no improving the ‘I Am’. The ‘I Am’ is before even experience. ’This’ is where everything arises. And there is no ‘one’ there to give or get experience.
“The Knowing with which the mind seems to know objects, others and the world, belongs to our Self, ever-present, unlimited Awareness, just as the light with which the moon illuminates the earth belongs to the sun.” -Rupert Spira
There is no where to stand to accept experience and move it forward to some idea that does not exist. There is just falling into Self. The ‘falling’ is the rest, as it is free enough to let go.
There is no higher state than ‘I Am’. ’That’ which Sees ‘It’ cannot be seen.
Love the Love, Daddy’O
The ‘alleged me’ cannot find the Ineffable, due to a mis-identity at the very outset. 
The fact is , that the ‘alleged me’ is now still looking, without knowing, and that ‘it’ is still an imposter, despite
Continued or renewed, looking through
Still, starting from nothing, the imposter (aka the ‘alleged’ me) is the one that can start the journey into getting past itself, when not misunderstanding that ‘that’ starting point, ‘is’ the point where the ‘conceptual imposter self’ ceases to exist in any meaningful way.
To suggest that an illusory self, that has hollowness at it’s core, is sufficient to travel to “What Is”, is to not have clarity. Clarity is always Present but not available when occluded by conditioned thinking and specious beliefs.
When we do not claim to have an epiphany, when we don’t claim to ‘get it’, and when we do not claim to ‘know it’, only then are we seeing the noun called the imposter.
Being, Awareness, Bliss are the verbs that never noun, except seemingly. See the ‘imposter’ claiming the nouns of identity. False identity is missing the ‘aliveness’ of Being.