When we say that we have to increase our Awareness by striving to be Awareness, we again impose limitations, due to coming from a pretentious and arbitrary starting point, i.e. illusory self.
The point here is that the Universe did not begin with the ‘idea’ of ‘me’. The ‘me’ is an artificial belief created like any other thing that has characteristics of being a temporal phenomena. It is a mis-identity with structural limitation. It has never been real nor ever will be enduring.
Nothingness has no view. Why would it? Nothingness Is everything without Being anything. The emptiness/spaciousness of ’Nothingness’ has no room for a view. Having a ‘view’ Here would be a ‘stop’ or landing. The infinite cannot be the infinite when a ’stop’ is defined as being part of this eternity.
The first step of Seeing the Seeing is Seeing everything as Awareness. To start with the ‘me’ or the person is to misstep. The extreme limitation of ‘me’ reduces the Fullness into a narrow funnel. Beginning every Moment from ‘Everything’ first, gives a spaciousness
This letting go allows Everything to Be everything effortlessly. When there is ‘no view’ there is no jump to judgment. The openness of Everything never closes. The aliveness is perpetual. The stops never exist. It Is Beingness Being Being.
The broadness of Beingness Is a constant Seeing of the Seeing everywhere and in every Moment effortlessly. The Fullness is a felt Presence without the need for thinking and/or perseverating on the ‘me’. The Fullness is primary as it Is Everything without limits (no view).
When there are no lines drawn in Nothingness; what can be left and felt is but Nothingness and perfection. Be ’That’ effortlessly Here and Now.
LOOKING FOR A LANDING
There is nowhere to land this thing. Understanding that understanding is not a viable methodology for ‘getting it’. Leaving understanding as a place reserved for ‘things’, is understanding that there is a place for understanding.
This ‘thing’ called spirituality is still a ‘thing’. That is, spirituality is a concept in search of understanding. If we land ‘here’ we are not ‘there’ because ‘here’ and ‘there’ are fixed places that have lost their essential dynamic of aliveness. Essentially, when we are ‘fixed’ or we have ‘landed’, we make a stop where there are really no stops.
We are then essentially forms demanding to continue to be forms. Forms are ’stops’ or landings that evoke a completion or end. All that is OK for forms. But are we a form first and last? Forms are landings that when settled on, stop movement and aliveness. ‘We’ are not sticking anywhere as Beings Being.
The idea of ‘looking’ for a ‘landing’ is an acknowledgement of being stuck in a form for a form, neither of which goes anywhere. Understanding that understanding is a loss leader for being Being, is understanding that understanding is not ‘the way’.
Pure Knowing is not ‘understanding’. Pure Knowing is knowing ‘Knowing’ or Awareness, is being aware of Awareness without the necessity of ’thinking’ or ‘understanding’. Conceptual thinking and conceptual understanding are limitations due to their subsequent status indigenous to creation or phenomena.
What ‘Is’, ‘Is’, with no help from ‘ideas’ to try to state what is prior to concepts. ‘Isness’ is undefinable given conceptual restraints. Defining ‘Isness’ is like trying to land the ‘Formless’ when it should be obvious there is ‘nothing’ to land.
‘Looking for a landing’ is using our Beingness to find Beingness in a ‘thing’ or location. That effort is futile, as there is no location, as Beingness Is all locations and not locatable as a ‘thing’ or concept.
This is the freedom of Beingness, Being everywhere/nowhere, Being Formless while Being in forms. To try to land ’This’ is to not know the nature of our Nature. Yet, at the same time, the struggle is that we continue to ‘land’ someplace, somewhere with some thing, nonstop.
Being ’Nothingness’ means that there is only room for nothing. Putting ‘something’ in ‘nothing’ ruins ‘nothingness’. This spaciousness is spaciousness because ‘nothing’ sticks to it resulting in no sticking points.
The ‘me’ is always looking for something to buttress its apparent falseness. It will try to land spirituality like it lands everything else. Why wouldn’t it?!
The intention here is to embrace the ‘Knowing’ as ourselves. Our selves being ‘nothing’ and this ‘nothingness’ having nothing to ‘do’ with the ‘me’.
See the ‘me’ as the phenomena it is. The ‘me’ is what is perceived. What is perceiving cannot be found as a ’thing’. See the phenomena and ‘Be’ the Seeing, effortlessly (without trying).
The ‘me’ is a landing. See the space around the ‘me’ and the mechanism (effort) of landing the ‘me’. Perceiving has no stops, ever. See ‘It’. Pure Knowing has no stops or places to land. It is not a concept.
To ‘have’ a concept is for the concept to have you. There is no-one Present to have a concept. The ‘Knowing’ is not conceptual as there is no ‘me’ to have anything and/or to land anywhere. Be ’That’, forever falling free.
Love Loves Loving, Daddy’O 
DANCING IN THE SEA OF TRANQUILITY
Everything is Love.
Breaking free from what we think, is breaking from a staid view. Surrender from a singular point of reference called ‘me’, is a surrender of the illusion of separation. Losing separation gains everything as everything Is Everything.
Any form or phenomena is present in Everything. Everything Is space-like in that ‘this’ formlessness is suffused within the form and holding form as well. There is nothing that is outside of the formlessness. The formlessness that contains everything ultimately is everything.
There is nothing that is not ‘It’.
Our bottom line in this very moment, is existence or Being. This knowing is knowing the formlessness. Knowing existence is ‘knowing’ without the need for form.
Our existence is being held by the divine spaceless-ness of space. ‘It’ Is an openness that has no location or finding. This spaceless-ness has never moved. ‘It’ cannot be perceived. Therein lies the common problem. We are stuck on finding and getting forms. This tendency monopolizes our resources completely, resulting in the singular view.
There cannot be any position taken by anything or anyone when moving towards the ‘Openness’ of whom we are. Even understanding is an impediment because ‘this’ cannot be understood.
The divine space holding existence cannot be seen internally when poxed with ‘the view’ from the illusory self that limits the unlimited. “All Is Love” is not an understanding as much as it is a Knowing. A Knowing from ‘no view’ and no attachment to forms/phenomena, does ‘Know’.
A singular point of reference is exceedingly limiting and narrow, to grasp any real Knowing of formlessness. This ‘Knowing’ is sourced from Source not conceptual-ness. It Is unacquired knowledge versus acquired knowledge.
The spiritual heart space is the nexus to formlessness. A felt sense of existence and transcendence immediately fosters a connection to this spaciousness. The feeling is the resonance of openness. Effortless Love abides here, Being everything and attaching to nothing. Turning attention inward ‘here’ is returning to forever.
All is Love. The ‘I Am’ (existence) is the vehicle for expression of Life Itself. Allow ‘this’ effortless-ness. The dance we dance is Life dancing through us, with ‘us’ Being within the Sea of Tranquility, and ultimately the Sea of Tranquility.
“. . .this is based on the assumption that I, who would control things, am something apart from what I would control.” -Alan Watts
Let Love Love always, Daddy’O
WHO NEEDS A ‘VIEW’?
We do really need to establish ourselves in society properly by having a view. A view may certainly be helpful in negotiating the rigors of day-to-day life. However, ‘locking’ on a view is a different story.
A ‘view’ is essentially a very temporary distillation of the big picture. The big picture cannot be accurately interpreted by our fractional piece of what we ‘think’ is true. The vastness is even difficult to comprehend scientifically because of paradoxes or contrary things happening at the same time e.g. black holes.
Essentially a ‘view’ may explain some things but clearly, to be definitive, is something else. Science itself progresses in its view from apple falling in Newtonian physics to the observer effecting the observed in Quantum Mechanics and beyond. Views evolve. And views still cannot contain the immensity of infinity.
Ergo, ‘views’ are always a compromise. Their separateness from reality is their bane.
Having a ‘view’ is the wrong view as far as Beingness is concerned. Beingness needs no view. Beingness is all views.
The other problem with ‘views’ is there is no-one there to have one. The character is not real enough to sustain a ‘view’ unless we believe otherwise, and that then is an illusion.
To have a ‘view’ is to have limitation. To be limited is to not be free, i.e. to be bound. ‘Boundlessness’ has timelessness and nothingness yet no need to have a view as ‘It’ Is Everything.
A ‘view’ is ok as a practical application to living but clearly with the caveat that any binding is a finding of having too much of a ‘view’.
To wit, the ‘view’ is as disposable as toilet paper. To cling to a view is make a vow to the ‘view’, inculcating it into our identity. The result is that the ‘view’ really has you. This is the binding.
Practically speaking, if we are wondering why we are stuck and why we do not know what to do -that is an example of having a view.
The stuck-ness, and the view are both indicators of someone having something. In this case something undesirable.
All this is pointing to the derision created by entertaining a ‘self’. A false self is the assertion of not ‘Being’. Not ‘Being’ is pushing the foreground of self over the everything of Being.
‘Being’ is not an assertion. It Is effortless-ness with absolutely no lines drawn, ever. Pushing will assure us of never being Being. Too much ‘view’ is pushing. No view, is spaciousness with no obstacles to attach to, as spaciousness is the clutter free backdrop.
When things are seemingly not going well for us, perhaps we are entertaining too much of a ‘view’ and too little of ‘no view’.
Stepping back, and then again stepping back, and again finding ourselves in the falling of stepping back, allows the foreground to come into its very clear temporary-ness, as a short phenomenal event, just as any ‘thing’ in any phenomena is.
Simple existing as ‘existence’ with no added features, assures us of the propriety of Being Life Itself. ‘It’ Is enough. ‘It’ Is full enough already. To add a ‘thing’ is too subtract. No views is Nothingness.
Love Loves all always Now. Daddy’O
MEDITATION IS BEING BEING
There can be no ‘doing’ in Being nor in meditation. For meditation is Being with absolutely no ‘doing’. ‘Doing’ meditation is ‘thinking’ we are meditating. Iterating, meditation cannot be done or be thought-based.
The Priorness we all Are, Is the thing-less-ness of just Being. This Priorness can also be called “I
Am”, existence, Awareness, and/or Beingness. But these all are just words that just point to an unmistakable and undefinable Self we all Are.
The point is that existence, the basic start of life in this venue, is without argument. If there was no existence then there would be no further movement into thoughts, feelings, sensations, or other things. Without existence, all the above matters not.
Meditation is not a ‘doing’ because we actually go nowhere and do nothing. There is no need to travel to even another state of mind because that would be over-engaging into phenomena, when our seeming goal is recognizing existence or Beingness. Since Beingness is always Present, travel is completely irrelevant. And the act doing of anything would make no sense, as that would be a departure from existence and an indulgence in ‘things’.
And ‘doing’ could also imply a ‘doer’. Is the ‘doer’ prior to things or after existence? The ‘doer’ is more phenomena. Existence needs no ‘doer’ nor the illusion a ‘doer’ represents.
Life is ‘doing’ without the need for a ‘doer’. ‘It’ is the verbing without stops or nouns needed to Be. Nouns are ‘things’. ’Things’ are post-Being not prior. Any ownership can only be attributed to the Causeless Cause, i.e. Life Itself.
Meditation is getting that there is no-one to get it or do it, leaving only the ‘I Am’. Meditation Is emptiness, spaciousness, silence that Knows the experience as well as the Experiencing as Self. Existence needs no help in existing. Meditation Is honoring Life at this seminal level without things structuring it.
Focusing on what we Are requires no effort. Directing attention outwardly, is engaging in an illusory world when viewed from the eternal Priorness. Our true nature is absolute stillness and the silent groundless ground.
This freedom has no boundaries and therefore can contain everything while not being anything. Acknowledging ‘this’ in every Moment, is meditation effortlessly accomplished, with no trying or not trying.
Be ‘That’ always. Being Being Is the Priorness to every thing.
Love Always Now as there Is only Love. Daddy’O
LOOKING IN ALL THE WRONG PLACES
“Looking from an illusion, for an illusion, is delusion.”
For what?! For something. Something that is never really found as far as permanence is concerned. ‘Something’ is that ‘thing’ that attracts us causing unnecessary effort and dogged stubbornness in getting ‘it’s’ consummation. It is a tiresome venture with no happy ending.
But we still ‘believe’ we can do it. But there is no ‘doing it’ because ‘doing’ cannot get it done. And what we are ‘looking’ for can’t be found ‘where’ we are looking nor by ‘what’ is ‘looking’. Lastly, the inherent ’belief’ is another fictional element that has no basis in reality, increasing delusion.
‘Looking’ itself is farfetched in that ‘that’ activity is futile, because when Everything Is Present, where could you effectively ’look’?
This futility is compounded by not only no satisfactory finding, but the shallowness of ‘what we find’. What we find is always temporary and unfulfilling. Satiation and contentment do not arrive.
So, a thought arrives that we dearly need something or somebody. The thought appears to be valid, but whose thought is it? This thought’s illegitimacy is immediately found out upon the above reflection. The illusory ‘me’ really needs nothing as it is an illusion. The ‘me’ is the neediness.
But let’s say that we skip over that boulder and go on with this particular thought. Going with, greeting, and harboring this thought results in a clear preference for leaving Beingness. The Fullness of having ‘no thought’ is replaced with a ‘thing’ aka thought.
Already the dissatisfaction has arrived due to the separation. Needing that something or someone becomes a ‘push’. Just the ‘push’ is uncomfortable. We now grasp from the wrong type of emptiness. Discomfort accelerates and then we may engage in further action to consummate the desire, completely losing our center.
We just threw Beingness under the bus and now expect to get the happiness and satisfaction that was never there to begin with, through this superficial engagement.
Any desire for something or someone, by the ‘me’, has the capacity to bind and stop connection with Self, by the the mere ‘looking’. This action is clearly, upon introspection, is coming from a deficit, a neediness that supplants Fullness (remarkably). Also, the seeming necessity of courting the desire must be questioned.
This superficial viewpoint, this extremely narrow path of ‘me’ first, is what seemingly upends the fullness of Being. The strength of the desire is artificial and impure from the standpoint of the un-necessariness of ‘looking for’ any ‘thing’, e.g. externally-based happiness, for and from the path of ‘me’.
Looking from an illusion for an illusion is delusion. This is the wrong view, yes?
Beingness is the true foreground but is seemingly only Present in the background. Seeing Everything from what is usually the backdrop, is now switched to the proper view (foreground first) that negates the silliness of the very restricted path of ‘me’ first. Beingness Is Everything anyway. Getting it right is a matter of ’Seeing’ not ‘looking’, from Beingness.
In the ’Now’, backdrop becomes foreground. This reversal is the start of ’Seeing’ from Emptiness. Subsequently foreground/background become meaningless as there is no real reason to have a distinction in Oneness.
So, there is no need to ‘look’ for anything. Just ‘looking’ is an indicator of a misstep. The synchronicity of Beingness is implicitly Present. Being fully Present in this Moment without any cause to commit to any thought, is enough. A constant falling into our true heart, integrates all that is already integrated.
Ceasing the ‘looking’ will result in no ‘wrong places’. Follow the ‘heart’ home to Here and Now.
Be that. Love that. Love Is effortless. Daddy’O
Thoughts by themselves are not independent. They are dependent on something, as they are ‘things’.
Having a thought that provides a solution of losing the ‘my’ of attachment, is just another thought that also attaches itself to the illusory self because it is being done for the ‘me’, a close relative to the ‘my’. This prevents the new ‘thought’, that tries to dislodge the ‘my’ in thoughts, to be trapped in the same trick bag. The ‘me’ can’t 
This brings us to perceiving, knowing, seeing and the other verb-like aliveness that never stops moving while still being the ’Stillness’ that is distinct and prior to thoughts and thinking. This ‘
The number of thoughts are reduced as their unnecessariness is exposed from this perspective of Everything first in foreground. Be in Everything first, then thoughts if necessary.
Love Loves Everything. 
In ‘no view’ there are no preferences. If there were a preference a view would be served.
Is there really a need to have a view if all views are being served? All views can be served if all views are really ‘one’ view, which is ‘no view’.
Since all ‘persons’ are illusory, as in a dream, there is no need to have any view. If there is only ‘one’ then is that really a ‘view’?
In order to have a ‘view’ there needs to be an alternative view, yes? There are no ‘real’ persons so is there really an alternative view? There is only one ‘view’ i.e. ‘no view’.
So what’s the problem here? We all seem to have a view when there is no need for a view. Having a view means we are creating something that is clearly superfluous.
However, at the same time we demand to have a view for each ‘person’. Obviously, when we lose the need for a person we lose the need for a view. The ‘person’ demands a view so that the ‘person’ can come seemingly alive to demand its illusory life.
To wit, the compounding of investment in a ‘person’ just keeps on growing and growing. The ‘view’ then opens to enormous interest that is again, compounded.
’No view’ cannot be reached as there is no distance to go and nothing to reach. Going ‘here’ cannot be reached as it is ‘here’ and ‘now’. Going outside of ‘here’ is pure illusion. Leaving ‘here’ to find something ‘there’ requires time and that is an illusion called future. Only a ’seeming’ ‘person’ would look for an illusion.
‘No view’ is the fullness of spaciousness with everywhere to go while going nowhere. Holding something that doesn’t exist is stopping (seemingly) the flow that never stops flowing.
Love Is loving all views while Being no view. Daddy’O
What is obvious is not normally called out due to its ‘obviousness’. The strength of ‘obviousness’ is that it does not need to be called out. To call it out, is to make a point about what we take for granted. What we take for granted is so apparent it normally needs no calling out. ‘It’ offers a consistency of performance, that its failure to be, would ‘un-ground’ us.
As a default and response for ‘obviousness’ to never leaving the scene, we look to the unstable phenomena that comes and goes, for assurance, stability and reliability, to keep us sated and situated in our world.
Going with the instability of phenomena, we wonder why we can’t seem to settle down without having the jitters. When we accomplish some substantive goal, soon afterwards, we lose that satisfaction and then pine for another accomplishment, ultimately never being satisfied or fully sated (contentment), after any goal that we feel will give us what we want.
But everyone is doing it, so it must be right. Wrong.
Ergo, the view of seeing and glorifying the obvious (phenomena) versus being the ‘obviousness’ may need to be adjusted. If stability and contentment are the ultimate barometers of standing steadily in a seemingly changing world, then perhaps we were (or are) standing on shifting ground.
That’s the point. ‘Obviousness’ is so there that it cannot be an object of interest. ‘It’ Is Us. Us as just ‘there-ness’ without any phenomenal dynamic. If we had an interest in ‘obviousness’ as we do in phenomena, we would fan separation.
So, if we want to be ‘that’ ‘obviousness’ that is seemingly overlooked, we push away from ‘obviousness’ when we desire to be that ‘obviousness’.
Love Loves Effortlessly, Daddy’O 
Love Is Everything and Everything Is Love. Love loves Love because It Is Itself Loving, Loving It’s nothingness and openness. The characteristic of ’no conditions’ and/or no thing-ness, allows Love to Be Everything. ‘It’ Is only Love.
Similarly, ’gifting’ (as described here) is potentially a verb without a landing or need to become a noun. ‘Gifting’ can be a form of Loving if one responds from pure Love when giving freely with no need for ownership or remuneration. ‘Gifting’ then becomes a vehicle for Love.
Gifting of trinkets or things is essentially a cover for expressing pure Love.
For some, direct Loving can be a threat if the heart is armored and protective. ‘Gifting’ is not as direct but the ‘Love’ is right there, before the gifting, during the gifting and after the gifting. When no-one owes anyone after the gifting, including the need to reciprocate, the gifting has probably given Love.
Parrying Love through a thing is what makes the ‘thing’ worthwhile. Without Love, the thing is just a thing with no inundation of Love Present and resonating. Constantly coming from the field of Love, ‘things’ take their place as temporary phenomena, and ‘Loving’ Is Present as the permanence of Being. ’Things’ can then become a conduit for expression of Loving but not for attachment to phenomena.
The distraction of a gift often lowers the defenses of the receiver to receive rather than ask ‘Why?” The receiver may need a reassurance to accept, but less so if Love is given directly from the heart first and then the gift. Love never stops Loving regardless of the circumstances in this or any transaction. Love has no stops.
‘Gifting’ a gift is essentially gifting Love. When is Love not Loving or gifting? It Is in the nature of Love to Love. It Is who we Are. A gift is not needed for Love to be Present. But sometimes it is just more fun to pretend we need a gift.
It Is all Love Loving Love, Daddy’O