All posts by edwardleinartas

About edwardleinartas

"Be The Moment: A Practical Guide To Being". I am the I am. After ‘that’, is only an appearance. Be the Be, then do the do. You cannot ‘do’ the ‘Be’.

WHAT CONTAINS EVERYTHING IS EVERYTHING

Belief has caused us to lose our ‘sense of reality’. Making ‘the dream’ a reality does not make Reality. And yes, we create our own reality. When we dream, often enough, we believe the dream. When we are awake in in the waking dream we have ultimately created, we believe ‘that’ dream as well.

Compelling as a dream is, ‘it’ is not an eternal existence, rather more a sleeping and/or waking dreaming. Awareness of a dream is awareness of unreality i.e. both the sleeping and waking dreams.

Awareness of any dream is awareness of the very temporary. The discerning factor in Reality is Awareness of Awareness. ‘Looking for’ Awareness from the dream is abiding in the dream, while dreaming about ‘Awareness’. ‘Dreaming’ is ‘seeing’ from the seeming separateness. ‘That’ is not ‘Awareness Being Awareness’.

Awareness never stops Being Awareness. Awareness is always before any identification with thought. ‘That’ Beingness never stops in Awareness. Awareness is never ‘second’ to dreaming and/or thoughts. False identification with dreaming/thoughts is the artificial forgetting of Awareness. Awareness never actually leaves/forgets nor could It.

Like a magician, ‘seeming reality’ points to irrelevant content in order to persuade us with the ‘grossness’ of ‘seeming reality’ so we can play this virtual dream in a time-based container. All the while, Awareness is playing coy, silent and formless, watching everything while being nothing. The headset of ‘seeming reality’ has imaginary content, that everyone generally agrees with, to wit, a compelling belief and response to an imaginary world.

Behind and before the creation of this phenomena, ‘You’ Awareness quietly abides. The constant loading up on the gigabytes of data in our virtual headset, convinces us of the faux importance of gaming the game in favor of the game. The magician of the ‘game’ constantly points us to winning the game. However, taking the game seriously, we always lose the game despite the scoring of this false reality.

The meaningless score in the game of life is always pointing to the ‘end of experience’ of gaming. Moreover the pointing challenges the built-in premise that the game is real. The game is a virtual dream. There is no winning this game except in the narrow context of the game. And ‘that’ is clearly only a game/dream. The ‘experience’ is not the ‘before’ of the non-stop-ness of experiencing. Experiencing experiencing is Awareness of Awareness.

Here Is everywhere. What contains everything Is Everything. The perfection of Everything needs no scoring. Virtual headsets are dreams We Are dreaming as the Everything that Is everything. What doesn’t change is The Everything. What changes is everything we dream. The dream is never the ultimate Reality. What Is dreaming the dream Is Reality.

The content is not the Formlessness that Is. What contains everything Is, and has no temporary form of any kind. Surrendering the waking dream Is Being formless emptiness with nothing needing to be done. This is full freedom. Channel ‘That’ effortlessly Now.

YOU ARE THE PATH

There is no one else present. What ‘Is’ present Is Presence. The ‘one’ to presumably ‘do’ the path is a creation, a temporary creation, that cannot possibly ‘do’ anything meaningful in connectivity, despite ‘meaningful’ intentions. That ‘doer’ is a mere idea.

The connectivity we presumbly seek, is not something ‘created’. ‘It’ just Is. The ‘seeking’ is an immediate undermining of ‘What Is’ already eternally Present. The ‘seeking’ is unnecessary travel down a dead end. But going down a false path does have its utility. All ‘seeking’ tells us that ‘seeking’ is a dead end endeavor.

Dead ends leading nowhere immediately inform us of a futile path. We certainly do not find the ‘connectivity’ to Self we ‘thought’ we could secure. Connectivity just ‘Is’. It cannot be found as it was never lost.

What ‘Is Present’ cannot be found (by seeking). ‘It’ just ‘Is’. What ‘Is Present’ cannot be lost, ever, as ‘It’ always ‘Is’. To suggest that we have to ‘look’ for ‘It’ is to misunderstand connectivity.

Connectivity Is. Connectivity Is Presence Now, eternally Now. ‘This’ is not a cognitive exercise where logic, thoughts, ideas, and paradigms reign. ‘It’ is before/after all that. Connectivity is always occurring in every moment. To get lost in ideas and thoughts about ‘it’ is to deliberately choose to try to lose connectivity. Futility consistently will show up when we mis-state Presence as ‘absence’. The lack of any ‘doing’ immediately can tells us that Presence can never leave ‘Us’ as ‘It’ Is ‘Us’ always.

Being everything, we seemingly can’t find anything. The ‘looking’ needs to stop its seeking. The formless does not need a form. Still, formlessness is in all forms. Forms and/or no forms, is not the issue. There is no outside to surrender to nor is there an inside to distinguish ‘All that Is’ from ‘All that Is’. ‘All that Is’ Is just ‘All that Is’.

To choose the view of getting lost in thoughts, is to choose the temporal path with temporal/limited outcomes. Conversely, the choiceless path of no path, is effortlessly Being Being (sans ‘doing’) with no limits. ‘See-ing’ the ‘no view’ of just effortlessly Being, beyond a thought-based time-limited existence, takes Us off the ‘path’ to Being The ‘path’.

‘No view’ is all ‘views’. Everything is ‘neutral’ until ‘We’ say it isn’t. There are no preferences nor paths Here. It just Is. Surrender surrenders into Itself. There are no ‘others’. The ‘expression’ is an expression. What is ‘expressing’ Is What Is.

Be the pathless path. You Are.

THERE IS NO PATH

This is not a personal journey. If it was a personal journey then the temporary would become permanent. What is projected by thought is another thought. Thoughts are things that do not have consciousness. What sees the thoughts and other phenomena, is not a thought. Thoughts are phenomenal things that exist ‘in’ consciousness and never as consciousness.

Saying ‘it’ is personal does not make ‘it’ any more real. Existence alone has consciousness. What ‘exists’ always existed. What never existed never will exist. And yet there is consciousness everywhere. Consciousness moves through the temporary/phenomenal e.g. the person, but is not the ‘person’ per se.

This distinction is implicit in Being Being. Being Being is permanent regardless of the presence/absence of a body or incarnation. Making ‘it’ a personal journey is to miss the seemingly less obvious permanence of just Being. Beingness is accessible with or without an incarnation. It Is existence that never stops existing.

There is no path for the non-existing. Having a ‘view’ as a separate person does not make a real existing entity. The absoluteness of ‘existing’ Is absolute. Wanting or desiring something different is not tenable in the least as far as ‘making’ existence. Consciousness Is always Consciousness. Phenomena is the temporary moving through the permanence. It’s nature is as illusory as it is temporary. Check your dreams out.

To suggest a path for phenomena to blossom into existence, that has always been permanent, is to soley depend on concepts without clearly experiencing experiencing just experiencing. In other words, just Being Existing without any need for phenomena of any kind is to ‘Know’ this ‘Knowing’ without any ‘thing’ being added to include ‘time’.

To ‘have’ a path to the Absolute would require a ‘someone’ to transmute into ‘existing’ when there cannot be any more or less of ‘existing’. No one ‘has’ a path because ‘existing’ does not start nor stop. It Is always existing as ‘existing’. ‘Change’ is indigenous to phenomena not ‘existence’. As ‘existence’ there would be no need to ‘have’ anything period. Any ‘to have’ idea would be an absolute downgrade to Being Being aka existence.

Existence cannot ‘have’ a path. It Is existence. There is no path to ‘get’ there because ‘You’ existence, Are always Present. There is no ‘doer’ or ‘getter’. ‘That’ would be phenomena.

A silent mind is not projecting. Silence plus ‘openness’ is even better. Hoarding concepts, ideas, and preferences does not bring clarity. Being the spaceless space requires absolutely nothing. Be ‘that’ effortlessly.

‘You’ cannot get out of what ‘You’ were never in. There Is nothing to control when ‘You’ Are Everything and Everything Is (done). The ‘path’ is an absolute ‘no path’. Lose the ‘beliefs’ and experience the permanence of just experiencing experiencing.

EFFORTLESSNESS WANTS NOTHING

Wanting’ betrays a lack of fullness. When we are full we are sated. We relax. We feel contentment. We are essentially at ease with no need to grasp and/or ‘get’ anything. The ‘pushing’ stops and we just enjoy whatever.

This overt lack of pushing for something, is not an altered state. It Is our essential nature. There is nothing we ‘have to’ do to get there. It Is already Present without any ‘doing’. To ‘do’ to get it, is to miss the point entirely.

Effortless wants nothing. Is there a better definition?! The freedom of effortlessness is the implicit-ness of non-doing. The ‘doing’ becomes a ‘pushing’ with an invalid ‘control’ factor that creates a little dictator. Does all this intrigue us? What is intriguing is our loss of ‘control’ when we sincerely believe we are in ‘control’.

There is no ‘other’ so there can be no ‘other’ controller, unless we believe it so. Do we then see that ‘belief’ has been engendered, thereby giving us a false controller, as we trade-in our effortlessness for imprisonment to content and concepts?

What a deal! Enslavement and unhappiness for a ‘seeming’ control!? And now effortlessness has been sent to the junkyard of the mind for what? For fear of losing a control you never had nor will ever have.

Who benefits? Who loses? Who is this ‘who’? When we ‘need’ to have ‘control’, who is it that needs to have ‘control’? Who needs to have control is the one that believes that control can benefit us better than effortlessness. Based on what?! Based on the instability of beliefs.

Believing in the concept of ‘losing’ control for the character is stepping into some deep doodoo. Giving control to the character we play, is tantamont to giving our nightly dream character control over our life. Does this make any sense? Why would we cede an ‘idea’ of control to a fictional/temporary character, that has no standing apart from a temporary dream? And what type of ‘seeming’ control would we give the dream and/or awake character?

This type of ‘control’ given is at best, illusory. A belief in control is an effort most often sustained by instability and pretense. An evidence-based look at how much control we have is easily illustrated in our steady inability to predict the future in order to direct the future. We cannot even forecast the next minute in weather with 100% accuracy. When we ‘command’ our lives with the illusion of control, do we really then believe in ‘that’ control’? Belief in a false idea can only exacerbate the likelihood of a negative outcome.

We Are before thoughts and beliefs about whom we ‘think’ we are. Thoughts and beliefs are not the ticket to Being Being i.e. effortlessness. Letting go of the adding of false control is accepting the Peace of Being Being effortlessly Now, while adding nothing.

Adding ‘nothing’ to Nothingness leaves nothing disturbed by an ill-fated effort of unnecessary ‘doing’. ‘Effortlessness’ means there is no controlling what is already happening. The peace comes in the acceptance of all ‘that’. Trying to control that which needs no supplemental control is futile and self-destructive.

Peace does not have a belief system. There is no ‘wanting’ Here. ‘It’ just Is effortless Beingness stabilizing a universe that is 13.8 billion years old.

BEING LOVE IS LOVE UNATTACHED

Attaching Love to some ‘thing’ is misunderstanding the empty nature of Love. And this understanding cannot just be a cognitive and exclusive idea. It is more a loss of cognitive ‘understanding’ that reveals ‘What Is’. ‘Not knowing’ translates to ‘not limiting’ the Unlimited.

Being Love is not ‘having’ Love. ‘Being’ Love adds absolutely no other considerations, as any additional consideration would be tantamount to tainting the pureness of Love. ‘Love’ Is complete without ‘any’ additions.

Adding ‘my’ and/or ‘your’ to Love is injecting Love with ownership. This would be an automatic downgrade of Love because of the implicit manipulation of trying to corral the un-corall-able. Essentially, this means that no one owns the One-ness. The ‘Oneness’ is never ‘yours’ or ‘mine’. There Is only one ‘Love’ and no ‘other’ can own it. Love Is this ‘Oneness’.

This discussion is to assert pure Love as Emptiness. Are we ever looking for ‘cloudy’ Love? Emptiness as formlessness/Love/Oneness Is the ‘Isness’ free of definition, cause, and/or meaning. To conceptualize ‘It’ is to downgrade ‘It’, by grounding ‘It’ to a false ground. There is no ‘ground’ Here.

There is no separate reality we can ‘ground’ into. It Is just ‘the perceiving’ of groundless Reality. It Is the ‘Nothing’ that Is ‘something’ un-seperate from Itself.

Moreover, there is no redundancy of Oneness called ‘me’. The un-founded ‘me’ has no existence. This pretense cannot be Love nor compete with Love, as ‘it’ has no real existence per se. Displacing the Reality of Oneness with an unsubstantiated ‘me’ is mere fantasy.

When we Are Love we Are our true nature. The perceiver and the perceived have no independent existence. To wit, there is no person Here to ‘have’ and/or ‘do’ anything. Nothingness needs nothing to Be Nothingness. Love as Nothingness/Oneness is never limited by what is perceived. Love Is the perceiving, un-perceived.Ultimately It Is only the Perceiving/Loving/Existing.

‘Not knowing’ is always pointing to the un-knowable and the un-limited Self of the Oneness of Love. Be the unlimited that Is always Present in the perfect background of existence while the particle and/or wave dance their way to and from the great Unknown as ‘neither’ and ‘both’. ‘Not knowing’ Is unattached and free. Love ‘That’ and Be free.

EMPTINESS HAS NO CONTENT TO INCLUDE ‘ME’

Emptiness fills Us as ‘Us’. That Is Emptiness. We are timelessly filled with Emptiness without time and without some ‘one’ to have ‘It’.

This is enough. More? Do we ‘think’ we need more?! Having ‘Nothing’ is perhaps lacking ‘something’!? Is this question then really a ‘belief’ that subsequently reveals a ‘self’ that is naturalized through the domestication of thought -yes?! Yes.

‘That’ would be an explicit addition to Emptiness/Nothingness. Can we add a ‘something’ to an explicit ‘nothing’ and then still maintain an emptiness? The question does not, in this case, need an answer due to its obvious conflict and obvious answer.

Adding content, to include the ‘me’, is not adding more ‘Nothingness’. Nothing needs to be added. Nevertheless, we feel we are compelled to ‘do’ something because of the threat of doing ‘nothing’ seemingly keeps us in an uncomfortable stasis.

The ‘doing’ by a virtual ‘doer’ is the ‘adding’ to the construction of more content, when no additional content is needed for Emptiness to Be Emptiness as completely as Emptiness can Be. Any additional content put towards Emptiness, does nothing to change Emptiness in any way, anyway. All ‘content’ is ephemeral. Content is the ‘seeming’ changing illusion. Even ‘this’ illusory content is ultimately the permutation of Nothingness, as formlessness, choosing temporary form.

The ‘me’ is not the point, contrary to popular belief. The ‘me’ has about as much meaning as one of the “Mario” brothers. An illusion is an illusion. One illusion is not any more important than another illusion (unless we ‘believe’ it does). Illusions need belief. Reality, what is happening, does not need a belief system.

Emptiness cannot be perceived. Emptiness is the ‘perceiving’. The ‘perceived’ (or illusion) cannot be the perceiving. Content (or illusion) has no independent existence. What has ‘independent existence’ cannot be content (or illusion). What is absolute permanence Is pure existing. Emptiness Is All That Is without stops for any thing.

Adding ‘some thing’ to Everything is futile. Everything/Nothingness/Emptiness Is formlessness existing without a need for form at any time (timelessly). The ‘what’ that is perceived cannot be the ‘Perceiving’. The context is ultimately never the content.

What is in an uncomfortable stasis is the ‘me’. Losing the ‘me’ is the death of illusion. No one dies in a video game nor in any illusion we co-create. The formlessness of pure existence carries no illusions about illusions.

Our Existence has always been ‘Our’ Existence. Forgetting ‘Our’ Existence does not change Our Existence. There is nothing to ‘do’ by another as there is no ‘other’ in All That Is. All That Is, Is always All That Is. Be the effortlessly Empty Being Being.

THERE IS NO PERSON HERE TO ‘GET IT’

When there is ‘no time’ no one asks what time it is. When there is no ‘person’ in charge, no one is there to ask about anything to include time.

Time indulgence, i.e. pushing past and/or seeking a future for a ‘person’, is engaging in delusion. Dropping the idea of transactional ‘time’ is engaging ‘what’ Is Here. Forbearance/perseverance of time is forbearance/perseverance of imposters posing as ‘somebody’.

Creating a ‘somebody’ out of nothing is much ado about nothing. ‘Nothing’ is ok until we make more out of it than clarity can support. When we distort Presence with ‘time-binding’, we practice cancelling a large swath of Reality (seemingly). Missing the forest for the trees is imaginary content overriding the Formlessness of Nothingness.

Nothingness Is unperturbed but the ‘me’ is improperly enhanced to a ‘real’ status, undermining Our implicit Absoluteness. The birthless/deathless Oneness goes on unperturbed with this seeming separateness of ‘me’. The ‘me’ is a mere illusion that can be clearly seen from only the ‘Seeing’ (no ‘see-er’).

Oneness Is always ‘Seeing’. The ‘me’ is the one with the stuckness of preferences. Everything Is One and everything Is neutral until ‘we’ say it isn’t. Preferences are NOT indigenous to Oneness as there Is only one ‘All That Is’. Oneness does not need to hold and secure any thing as ‘it’ Is all Oneness all the time.

The neediness of ‘having’ serious preferences occurs only in the ‘play’ of Awareness/Consciousness. The ‘play’ is the imperfection of having imperfection. What Is ‘playing’ the imperfection Is the Perfection. What never leaves and can never leave, Is the perfection.

The imperfection is clearly the idea of a ‘person’ separate from ‘All That Is’ in time. The ‘person’ is the imaginary preference ‘having’ preferences. How neat and tidy. ‘All That Is’ knowingly Knows this false premise but allows the imperfection/seeming separation to hide in plain sight. To take the idea of a ‘person’ seriously, is to miss the obviousness of Nothingness Being timeless.

It cannot be any clearer. When the ‘person’ stops trying to be Present, the blockage of ‘trying’ from an illusion, defaults to ‘All That Is’. It Is as simple as simple could be. To make it any harder is to only make it harder. Losing ‘trying’ is losing ‘time’.

There Is nothing to do and/or align. Everything Is already the ‘Self’ without any ‘trying’ from the alleged ‘person’. Be ‘That’ Now. It Is You un-wanting. ‘You’ already Are ‘It’. There Is no ‘time’ to ‘do’ it.

.

KNOWING THE ‘I DON’T KNOW’

Can ‘Knowing’ ever moderate? In other words, can the ‘Knowing’ ever change? There are four absolutes in this reality: 1) the Knowing( All that Is); 2) Being existence (the I Am); 3) output is input; and 4) everything changes except the first 3 absolutes.

The ‘Knowing’, the first absolute, never moderates as it serves as the ultimate stability for malleability or ‘seeming change’.

The three other absolutes are essentially still the ‘Knowing’ as all that Is Is all that Is. The 2nd absolute is the ‘I Am’ existence of being the ‘Knowing’. The only thing ‘I Am’ can be is the ‘Knowing’ of ‘Knowing’.

The 3rd absolute is ‘output is input and input Is output’. Whatever we put out we get right back. This is the circle of energy Being energy. Where else can ‘energy’ go when there is nowhere but Here?

Everything changes but the first 3 absolutes. This is the 4th absolute, i.e. the dream. This is the ‘real’ movie that occurs in a seeming time and place. The illusion of ‘change’ is an absolute illusion. The time and place are ‘seemingly’ present in timelessness. Change is the veil of the ‘Knowing’ seemingly not Knowing. Every ‘thing’ changes.

These are all distinctions appearing in the ‘Knowing’. The Awareness of ‘Knowing’ and what appears ‘in’ the ‘Knowing’ is ultimately the ‘Knowing’. Change therefore is ‘seemingly’ present.

It Is all absolute ‘Knowing’. The only answer to ‘I don’t know’ is The Knowing of It. To define it further is to misdefine it. It is not to be defined as ‘It’ cannot be defined.

Staying in the ‘I don’t know’, is accepting the finality of ‘not knowing’. The ‘Knowing’ is already complete. Nothing, only nothing can be added to It.

Being the Nothingness is the emptiness, the silence of Knowing ‘not knowing’. ‘Not knowing’ is freedom from the controller trying to control the illusion of the movie/illusion. There is no controller. There is no knower. It Is only the ‘Knowing’ knowing Itself.

Knowing the ‘Knowing’ is Being the ‘Knowing’ and nothing else. What else is there? “I don’t know. I only know changeless change.” That is enough. Know ‘this’ Knowing.

THINKING CANNOT ARRIVE AT EMPTINESS

The thought of ‘no thought’ is a thought according to ‘thought‘. Does ‘thought’ have all the answers?! Apparently so if ‘thought’ has anything to say about it. And that would be a big lie.

We are playing in a self-imposed limitation if ‘we’ limit ourselves to the field of ‘thought’. How do we know this? The absoluteness of ‘Existence’ Itself tells us this, by the mere presence of ‘Existing’ existing with or without thoughts/thinking happening or not happening. Without an absolute ‘Existing’ thoughts do not even have a field to think/abide in.

Existence precedes thought/thinking. Existence does not need thoughts to exist. It Is prior. It’s priorness is absolute. Existence is forever while thoughts and thinking are passing clouds that may or not be present (temporarily).

Consequently, thinking thoughts or not thinking thoughts, has no effect on the absoluteness of Existence (Being). Thoughts do not have a permanent base of existing independent of Existence Itself.

The Beingness of Existence has no dependence nor consequence from any thought or amount of thinking placed on It. Thoughts and thinking have an unearned status as equal to or better than Existence Itself. Thoughts and thinking have in effect seemingly subjugated what is prior, to a lesser status.

This seeming subjugation of Beingness has dumbed down our existence to a lower quality of living. The struggle now supplants the effortlessness that is natural only to pure Existence. Decision-making, in this ‘thinking’ modality, has a totalitarian flavor that tries to ‘control’ everything to support a false self that only has its spurious fictional existence to be concerned about.

Emptiness has nothing and ‘that’ is everything. ‘Control’ would be awkward Here as the Oneness is complete as It Is. The integration Here is perfection personified by the purity of Nothingness. Adding some such ‘control’ would be imperfection chasing perfection. Nothing can be added nor subtracted Here/Now.

We cannot ‘think’ our way out of the sticky idea that we need to get out of where we are really not ‘in’. Using ‘thoughts/thinking’ to get out of ‘thoughts/thinking’ will always keep us ‘in thinking’.

The obstruction of ‘dependence on thought’ is NOT believed to be an obstruction (by thoughts). Ergo, given these conditions, can thought get Us out of thought?!

Believing in thought and believing in believing, keeps us believing the superficiality of just believing. Is ‘believing’ enough to get us out of thinking and dependence on thought alone?

‘Our’ belief then begets a believer which supplants just Being Existence. Existence has no need for believers. There is no adding/subtracting beliefs, believers and ideas to Stillness. Stillness/Emptiness Is absolute (unchanging).

There is a felt-sense of just Being Being. Know ‘That’ from the ‘Knowing’ and not from thought. Believing is thought-based. This is as simple as simple can Be. There is never anything that can be added to the perfection that always Is. Emptiness/Stillness is not bound by any thought, idea, addition, or subtraction. ‘It’ just ‘Is’. Be free in this ‘Knowing’.

THE TRUTH IS BEFORE THOUGHTS OR IDEAS

The idea that truth is an idea, is just another idea. Using an idea to get another idea is going in circles with ideas and always ending up in just another idea.

To go past ideas cannot be to stay in ideas. To stay in ideas is to stay in the ephemeral change. To stay in the ephemeral change is to choose a temporary and changing vehicle that does not exhibit any stability.

Ideas change and evolve and yet they are not the source that generates them. Only an unchanging source can provide the ability to divine the changing from the unchanging.

Spiritual truth is not an idea nor a belief. Ideas, beliefs, and definitions are fluid and not eternal. Spiritual Truth Is who we Are and certainly not the stopped and clocked ‘experience’ we might of had. ‘Experiencing’ has no stops. Experiencing or Knowing never stops ‘experiencing’ i.e. Knowing Knowing.

Could there be an ‘experience’ without the Knowing of the experience? Experiencing/Knowing Is eternally on without a stop. If there was an actual stop then the eternal would not be eternal. The illusion of a stop is an illusion. Stopping for an illusory ‘person’ is also an illusion. There are no stops nor separate ones Here/Now. Moreover, the Experiencing/Knowing is underscored by not stopping nor starting, ever.

There Is a certainty to ‘never changing’ and ‘never disappearing’ that can be directly experienced even by the ‘person’ believing Self to be a ‘person’. Experiencing the ‘Experiencing’ is eternally stable/Present and accessible directly. The ‘person’ or the ‘character’ is not the ‘one’ to make that determination. That one, that is ‘Knowing’ is the ‘Experiencing’. Verification by an illusion would be investing in more illusion. Experiencing Experiencing creates space to more clearly see the illusion of person and the stop of holding of ‘experience’ by the person. The contrast of movement versus ‘the holding’ is stark.

The illusory character is then seen as illusory. The illusory character is stark because of the unending epic struggle to be whole. This perennial deficit is never present in experiencing Experiencing. Effortlessness of Being requires adding absolutely nothing, at any time, to the happiness that Is the Isness.

The Truth is just Us -the Oneness that Is all there Is. There is no more and there is no less. ‘That’ Is Everything Being everything. No stops ever. No ideas/beliefs to get stuck on. Be Life. Be Truth, Being constantly. All there is to a thought Is the Knowing/Experiencing.