‘Having’ an experience is not the point. ‘Having’ is essentially synonymous with ‘holding’ and ‘keeping’ an experience, let alone defining self through the experience. All ‘that’ is the route to trading and/or displacing ‘experiencing’ for a staid experience.

Experiencing, on the other hand, is a non-stopping of the perennial movement of being Being. Being does not deny any experience while contemporaneously leaving the appearance of the moment of experience as just ‘that’. ‘That’ appearance is only a temporary appearance taken out and abstracted from ‘experiencing’. ‘Experiencing’ is being Being without the seeming necessity of stopping for an experience at the cost of ‘experiencing’.

‘Experiencing’ is not ‘in’ time. It just Is. Timeless Beingness is what begets ‘time’. ‘Time’ is an add-on or in other words, essentially subsequent to the undiminished and complete fullness called ‘timeless-ness’. Using these concepts in defining ‘non-conceptual-ness’ is inelegant. Timeless-ness blends in seamlessly with another verb i.e. ‘experiencing’. ‘Nouns’ evoke a more staid -ness, e.g. experience. Nouns are concepts ‘in’ time.

Beingness has no ‘having’ because that would create an artificial presence of a false noun (experience) thereby displacing the more true verb-ing of ‘experiencing’.

The whole upshot of all this enumerating is that ‘creating’, ‘holding’ and ‘keeping’ nouns creates a separate self that then becomes the keeper of the stuff of nouns and creating nouns (noun-ing). This separate self is also another creation (or analogue) that is also derivative of taking verbs and making them into artifical nouns. This activity is an emasculation of the perennial movement of Beingness.

Just as in ‘experiencing’ and ‘Being’, being verbs verb-ing, ‘experience’ and ‘experiencer’ are nouns noun-ing. The resulting problems that result from a movement to a holding, is the creation of a separate self that is tasked with that ‘holding’.

Implicit in the above degeneration of activity of noun-ing verbs, is a created allegiance to a seeming holding of a manufactured identity i.e. a false self; separated and ultimately derived from Beingness.

So what is all the above amount to, as far as we are concerned? We ‘own’ all that. See the activity of ‘noun-ing’ as an activity. Yes, all that activity results in a ‘noun’. But it is the activity of making a ‘noun’ that must be seen to ‘See’ more clearly.

The process of creating and/or maintaining a false and separate self is the starting point of substantive change -in the wrong direction. To proceed as a separate self seeking change is to proceed in a closed loop. Continuing to ‘make’ nouns out of verbs verbing is the ticket to ‘stuck-ness’. Beingness has no ‘having’. There is no one Here ‘to have’ anything.

Being Peace brings Peace. Being Love has no need to ‘have’ Love. Happiness Is not someone being happy. That ‘someone’ is a noun trying to try to ‘Be’ when ‘Being’ Is always Present and complete Now.

There Is no ‘other’ unless we choose to create ‘that’ noun. And ‘that’ noun is ephemeral. What is not ephemeral Is the ‘Isness’ which Is all that Is. And ‘That’ Is effortlessly Being Being. There is no need for ‘having’ any thing.


There is only one energy constantly being. There is no other ‘Energy’. Everything is made from this foundational energy. There is no ‘other’ as ‘this’ Is all that Is.

The forms this ‘Energy’ takes are ephemeral. The Energy, however, is not ephemeral but eternal. The forms and appearances are the costumes that this formless energy takes in the arena of the vastness, called the universe both seen and unseen.

This ‘Energy’ has no name let alone any permanent form, yet ‘It’ has all names and forms because there can be no other than ‘This’. To put a name and form on ‘This’ would be to attempt to stop It’s magnificence. Calling ‘It’ ‘energy’, in this case, is an attempt to release formlessness from any partisan box. Here, ‘Energy’ is a neutral term. Other terms like ‘yours’ and ‘mine’, are more clearly a haven for polarization. Here, ‘Energy’ belongs to no one because It Is everyone.

‘Energy’, as a term, can spotlight formlessness without a knee-jerk tendency for subsequent polarization to creep into ‘mine’ and ‘thine’. This frees up any territorial turf into a more substantive knowing of the ‘Knowing’ of formlessness. Calling ‘It’ energy, uses an unbiased form for Being this formlessness.

‘Energy’ is considered to not have any other form except the formlessness of energy. Energy never really stops to become anything. ‘It’ does not relate to Russian versus American energy versus Ukrainian energy. ‘It’ is just free-flowing energy. Further labeling is unnecessary.

When we receive energy from our respective electric company, we do not really care if it came from Canada or Mexico or Texas. And we do not generally care if the government is Christian, Muslin, or Hindu, that distributed this energy (for the most part).

If there are sanctions against governments, it is really the governments, not really the energy, that is at fault. At our electric meter, we cannot really tell where the energy was produced and generally, we don’t really care.

Energy is just energy, which is a clear neutrality. We can make it Russian energy, Persian energy, or European energy. But that would be us adding something to ‘energy’. Energy itself has no preference.

Formlessness, being synonymous with ‘energy’, provokes a freedom from additional attachments that tend to separate us into factions. ‘Energy’ does not have a tendency of loading into nouns that beget separation. Despite being a ‘noun’, energy has a more verb-like freedom that promotes neutrality. Formlessness too, like ‘energy’ cannot be successfully be put into a permanent separate box.

There Is only one Energy. It does not stop to become a permanent person having an experience. ‘The Energy’ remains as energy not getting stuck in form. Transmuting into form, in any permanent way, would be compromising the essential state of ‘Energy’. ‘Energy’ never stops Being Being, despite appearances.

Albeit, there is no other choice than Being. Beingness, aka ‘Energy’, flows through ‘Us’ not to ‘us’. There is no holding in the flowing. It is pure foundational Love with a foundation that flows constantly.

The ‘Energy’ is loving loving flowing untethered. There is a neutrality to the energy of Loving that is tirelessly loving all. Loving all that Is, Is all that Is. This Is the power that energizes Life Loving Itself. Ultimately there Is no other Energy than Love loving Itself. Be free. Be Loving. Be the neutrality of unbiased pure Energy just Being.


What would be missing in ‘Nothingness’? If ‘All that Is’ Is all that Is, can anything really Be missing?

Contrarily we look for experiences because ‘Nothingness’ appears to be empty relative to our seeming needs. We also generate a lot of ‘have to haves’ by way of experience. Our definition of our ‘self’ happens to be a growing definition occluded by a lot of experiences. These are all limitiations self-imposed and reinforced moment-by-moment, on and on, in the broad conceptual experience called time.

Experiences and the holding on to experiences, are traps. Experiences define and limit us to ‘this’ and ‘that’. ‘This’ and ‘that’ are definitions that clearly limit ‘Us’. We then continue to seek more experiences with the definitions they provide, in an attempt to expand ourselves. Conversely, what happens is that we do not really expand Ourselves. We further limit Ourselves through an expanded limitation of definition.

Expansion through increasing limiting forms is not true expansion. It is more an accumulation of more forms. We trick Ourselves into ‘believing’ more forms, more stuff to accumulate, and more resume, is the ticket to true freedom from forms, ideas, and attachment to attachments.

Experiences are traps when we ‘have’ them. These ‘nouns’ are not moving when ‘experiencing’ finalizes it’s shift into ‘experience’. They are then set as ‘nouns’. Contrarily, ‘experiencing’, ideally, is always a verb never a noun. In other words, ‘experiencing’ does not really stop experiencing. If ‘experiencing’ were to stop then ‘it’ would not be ‘experiencing’. It would then become an ‘experience’ bound by the limitation called time.

Stopping ‘experiencing‘ would then become ‘owning’ an ‘experience’. Then the question becomes ‘who’ is owning ‘what’? All ‘that’ activity would be the creating of nouns, aka limitations; and faux owners of newly minted limitations.

Who we are Is ‘It’. This ‘It’ Is not a noun nor a limitation. This ‘It’ is a particular reference to ‘Being’ which has no limits relative to a typical noun. Being ‘It’ is unconditional and independent of any change as ‘It’ Is the Changeless.

This is where the limitation of language shows its limitation. Understanding does not take place in the ‘understanding’. The ‘Knowing’ is in the ‘not understanding’ of not knowing the presumed known. In other words, defining the ‘undefinable’ is not possible by definition. The futility of defining the ‘Ineffable’ (in this case) is an attempt to make an explicit verb a noun. ‘It’ won’t go there.

The inability to use methodology to define something is not enough to give it a dismissal. Because infinity cannot be put into a more convenient box does not preclude infinity from being infinity. It Is what It Is and ‘this’ is not a box-able noun.

There is nothing missing in ‘Nothingness’. ‘Nothingness’ is not a noun nor a ‘person’ having this verb called ‘Nothingness’. ‘Nothingness’ is full and complete without the help of a staid noun, concept, or box. Nothing can be added to something that is complete i.e. Nothingness.

We Are what Is happening. We cannot find Ourselves as ‘something’. We are the non-stop of Nothingness Being Nothingness Being everything without holding any appearance of appearance. Formlessness Is something without being anything. This is freedom. Be ‘That’ open -always limitless.


If it is ‘important’, how is that serving us?

As a result of labeling certain things as ‘important’, do we then ‘see’ that we are the party that is adding an intervention (that is not really necessary) to neutrality? This adding of another idea, that had nothing more to do with the initial result, is more unnecessary complication. Subsequently the ‘results’ and the responsibility for the ‘results’, gets a bit murky, especially when we tend to lose our responsibility for them. The overuse of ‘importance’ can create a veiled disregard for personal responsibility.

Not seeing, that we are the creators of our outcomes, is to misread the clear reality of our results. We can argue this all day long. We can try to avoid a confrontation with the responsibility that is implicit in transacting our seemingly ‘important’ energy-directed outcomes. Do we see that ‘we’ are the ones that made this happen? There is no ‘other’ to really blame when outcomes are less than desired.

‘We’ are the ones that change ‘neutral’ to another energy form. ‘We’ are in charge. Who is it that turns everything that was absolutely ‘neutral’ into another form of energy? Our likes and dislikes are often the outcomes of making/transforming ‘neutral’ to ‘ours’. We are the ones that ‘give meaning’ to life. If life needed meaning would ‘It’ stop being so alive?!

When we label something ‘important’, do we not change neutral into another form of energy? Adding ‘importance’ is clearly a major consideration in determining ranking, which in effect is a clear changing of neutrality. The ‘change’ in neutrality becomes ‘our’ change. ‘Our’ change becomes us. This is now ‘our’ unambiguous projection. Ramifications follow this designated lead made even more ‘important’ through giving ‘importance’.

We may complain about ‘our’ life, but who is the one that is making some things more important than others? And what is all ‘that’ based upon?

‘Importance’, in most cases, is a ‘go to’ that we constantly overuse to justify preferences. When we routinely give a significance to ‘importance’, we often spike the energy field unnecessarily. The ‘overuse’ of ‘importance’ tends to hide our overreaction to routine situations. Do we even see that having a solitary ‘reaction’ is often unnecessary? Adding ‘importance’ seals the deal to an often already specious reaction. And then, do we even see that the ‘importance’ added is most often arbitrary let alone unnecessary?

We are not ‘in’ the universe. We are the universe. What does this mean? Acceptance is another choice we often do not make, i.e. acceptance of changes versus changing change. We most often go for ‘change’. ‘Change’ because it is seemingly more important and seemingly do-able than acceptance. And here, again, ‘importance’ shows up trumping everything in sight. Can we start to see the ‘importance factor’ as maybe being a little too important? We Are the universe. Acceptance is existential purity.

As far as Being is concerned, there is nothing to be done, there is nothing to understand, and there is no absolute need for ‘thinking’ and/or reacting to appearances appearing/disappearing. Presence is forever Being Presence. There Is nothing but ‘this’. It’s importance Is It’s ‘un-importance’. This Is the neutrality. When ‘everything’ Is ‘everything’ what is important?

What Is serving ‘Us’ Is ‘Us’. This Is the greatest service.


There is no beginning to Awareness. There is no end to something that is thing-less. There is no start to something that has no finish. What is real is existing as nothing Being limitless-ness.

What Is before thought or form or especially the hardness of beliefs, just ‘Is’. ‘It’ just ‘Is’ elegantly whole while Being limitlessly open as the true Us. Beliefs have absolutely nothing to do with ‘It’. Beliefs are thought-based.

Demanding to know something about nothing is to not understand the openness of conscious aware space that has no cause. Contrarily, we as characters, have cause and effect. What has no cause is free of effect. That is, ‘It’ does not engage in effect as far as ‘It’ is concerned. ‘Effect’ is for all appearances and certainly not for what has no appearances. There is nothing to know Here except ‘Nothingness’. Concepts have the integrity of broken glass. Concepts cannot take you to Being Awareness.

All That Is is All That Is. Nothing changes Here. The eternal vastness of Awareness cannot be captured in a time/space continuum. The completeness is always the completeness of a pure resonance of unchanging Beingness. It is an ardent stability and a platform for a direct engaging in the unchanging Self. ‘That’ Is Present for us as ‘Us’. All That Is is All That Is ‘Us’.

That stability cannot even be defined in qualitative terms. The perennial perfection just ‘Is’ effortlessly always Present.

There is just ‘This’. Wholeness cannot be found in what is fragmented. Awareness Is the underlying Presence to absolutely all objects and characters. This emptiness has no content/form. ‘Having’ thoughts is ownership that ends up creating a’me’ character. Temporary characters have no primary existence, i.e. they are NOT before thoughts. What is fragmented (after thoughts) is a temporary creation. Awareness Is the perennial underlying Presence to all creation. ‘It’ just ‘Is’.

We do not need time (or a future) to become more complete. ‘What Is’, is complete now as consciously Present Awareness. To make a demand for the future is to willfully go into time for a resolution that is timeless. Now or never hails to the timelessness of Being Awareness Itself. Going into the construct of time for Beingness is futile.

There is only ‘This’, the perceiving of perceiving. Does ‘This’ perceiving ever end? ‘It’ cannot ‘end’ because there Is no ‘end’ as there Is ‘no beginning’. It just Is timelessly Now. There is no more or less to It. There is nothing to add to It or subtract from It, to include time. Again, there is no ‘end’ because there never was a beginning because there never was a construct of time to ‘do’ an appearance/disappearance of this or that.

Awareness just Is. Add nothing. Just Be. Amen to all ‘that’.


Thoughts happen. Do ‘they’ ever need to be ‘owned’ ? Do thoughts really ‘need’ an ‘own-er’? If thoughts do not have an ‘own-er’ then what becomes of their status?

Thoughts are ‘things’. ‘Things’ that are not ‘own-ed’ do not become unattended orphans. We give ‘our’ thoughts so much status that more often than not, they are like our children, belonging to us and identifying as us to a greater extent. Our relationship with thoughts has a direct impact on our quality of life.

Thoughts, all too often, are clearly more important than anything in our lives, even precluding a good relationship with our own family. This over- identification results in an identity that is based on a rigorous compliance to ideas and concepts, thereby trumping the freedom of just ‘experiencing experiencing’. Alienation from some family and some friends, is often based on a rigidity of our identity ‘to concepts’ rather than the free ‘use’ of ideas and not locking into conceptual frameworks.

Separation of ‘self’ into conceptual frameworks even alienates ‘us’ further into a disunity of ‘me’ among other ‘me’s’. Dualism arises easily into an ‘us’ versus ‘them’ coalitions, fracuturing the more natural ‘unity in diversity’. Thoughts, especially attachment to thoughts, are over-played tools gone amok. The ‘me generation’ is all too real.

As ‘real’ as this may appear, it really is pretty much ‘fictional’. There is no ‘us versus them’ unless we artificially create this dynamic. The ‘me’ can never be found to be existent because it never has existed. Newborns do not have a built-in fictional or any other kind of ‘me’. The ‘me’ has the existence and relevance of just another idea. Moreover, our continued identity with the ‘me’ seemingly changes all that.

When we ‘own’ our thoughts a ‘me’ is invariably created. Having no ownership ‘to’ thoughts allows thoughts to fall away on their own. The creation of ‘me’ creates an owner that corrals thoughts to support the ‘me’. Sustenance is given to thoughts by a fictional ‘me’ reinforcing both the ‘me’ and the parade of thoughts being attracted and identified with the ‘me’.

What a dysfunctional system! The parade of thoughts, led by the ‘me’, obscures the subtle silence and stillness that is the true sustenance of Being Being. The Seeing of ‘no view’ of Nothingness is seemingly overridden by a fictional character that has no real existence but does have a tiny viewpoint based on an artificial insemination of identity ‘after’ Beingness. This ‘owner’ of these thoughts has no more of a ‘hard’ reality than the specious thoughts that support ‘it’.

What experiences the object of the ‘me’ and thoughts associated with the ‘me’, is ultimately Consciousness. Consciousness is always the underlying presence to any object despite the ‘seeming’ obscuration. Consciousness cannot be touched by any obscuration.

There is no ‘ownership’ in Consciousness as ‘that’ would supplant ‘All That Is Is All That Is’, creating an impossible ‘two’. Emptiness has no content, objects, ideas and/or forms of any kind. It just ‘Is’ effortlessly. Consciousness Is Awareness Is Emptiness.

When we realize that there is no ‘one’ to own anything to include thoughts, ideas, and/or me’s, we stop stopping for those appearances that normally would drag us into the rapport that always ends badly -i.e. un-fulfillment. Not engaging by no longer ‘believing’ in a separate and false self, is ‘Seeing’ from the underlying Presence of just Being. ‘This’ Being has no stops because there is only Being becoming only Being ad infinitum.

The timeless/spaceless space of where It happens, Is forever the aliveness/fullness of the eternal Now. There is no ‘other’ to own anything, especially thoughts. Nothing owns nothing but Nothingness.


Spacious Presence has no content to process. Unnecessary processing is the problem in engaging in the pursuit of so called ‘happiness’. ‘Labeling’ instead of ‘noticing’, is often the unnecessary activity that besmirches the innocence of neutrality. Content has no meaning (a la noticing) until we give it meaning (labeling). Giving ‘it’ meaning, through endless commentary is akin to having a ‘Twittter’ on the inside. Happiness needs no content whatsoever to Be.

Everything is neutral until we say it isn’t. The streaming of content appears to be necessary due to misguided ideas of silence and stillness not being enough. The ‘Now’, always still and always silent, is everything with no lack of anything. Happiness Is ‘this’ -unchained by any content and un-possessed by any one.

‘This’ absolute fullness of Totality, is commonly and seemingly upended by the temporary character in the ‘seeming movie’ called ‘life’. In order for the illusory character to survive in its imaginary state of being, it struggles to exist and find happiness as the character. There is no real hope of being ‘there’, as a separate self, pursuing self, as this imaginary character, looking for a fleeting happiness. This activity is a ‘dead end’ from start to finish. ‘Looking for happiness‘ is clearly ‘missing happiness‘.

The question is what is real and what is fake news. Happiness cannot be found as there is no ‘finder’ to find it. The ‘finder’ is not real. Having an additional separate self to ‘All That Is’, is adding to a Fullness that cannot be added to. The Fullness Is happiness exclusively, without any ‘help’ and/or ‘hope’ of an imaginary character. Pursuit of happiness through a false self only adds obscuration to what is absolute clarity and completeness of ‘Being’.

There is no reason to look for happiness. If we need a reason to search for happiness, then we are on the wrong track at the outset. At any time that we need a reason to be happy, we will always fail to find the streaming of happiness that never stops streaming.

It is an ‘alert’ when we have ‘to look’ for happiness. That tells us immediately that we are on the wrong path. There is no path to happiness. Happiness just Is happening constantly.

When we ‘hope’ for happiness we have made a conclusion that ‘this’ is not ‘it’. While in truth, ‘this’ Is ‘it’ but not from any view i.e. that is, any character in a so-called movie. When we ‘see’ from any viewpoint, we constrict and limit Self. Higher Self has no limitations or viewpoints.

When we ‘See’ from ‘Seeing’ we ‘See’ and notice from a ‘no labeling’ and/or locking into any view or viewpoint. Having ‘an experience’ is a viewpoint with a ‘viewer’. ‘Experiencing’ ad infinitum is timeless viewing as spacious Presence with no holding of any content by anyone at any time.

‘Having’ an experience of happiness engenders a self that cannot get out of self. There is no ‘having’ in happiness. There is just experiencing happiness Being happiness with no start or finish. Anything less is a lesser vehicle -not happiness.

To ‘have’ a reason for happiness to flourish is to undermine the freedom of just Being happiness. Just Being happiness does not dumb-down to any content and/or deserved-ness to Be. Happiness Is Being and Is the pure nature of Existence Itself. ‘All That Is’ does not waiver Its perennial absolutes for temporary frolics.

Happiness cannot be looked for in life. Happiness Is everpresent. And there is no reason whatsoever that happiness can be reduced to anything less than absolute Fullness abiding right Now. To start at anything less is to miss Everything That Is. This Is the starting point and ending point and no point. It Is always Here, never changing and never leaving It’s Fullness. It Is You. There is no reason for It. Be Happy always. It Is Your effortless nature.


It is ‘both’ and ‘and’. It is circularity and linearity. It is everything and nothing. It is structure without a structure. It is ‘something’ that is ‘nothing’ and at the same time ‘nothing’ being ‘something’.

When ‘It’ is full ‘It’ is empty and open and uncluttered. When ‘It’ is empty ‘It’ is everything and everywhere. When ‘It’ is happening ‘It’ never stops happening nor did ‘It’ ever start happening. When there is nothing happening there is only ‘happening’.

Every Moment is full. Every Moment is empty. ‘This’ can seemingly be described and at the same time, never can be described. ‘This’ moment is never really ‘in’ time. Albeit time is contained ‘in’ this Moment.

Feeling open-ness and emptiness is feeling nothing-ness. There is nothing there to feel except spaceless open-ness finding Itself. At the same time, there is nothing to find in open-ness. Finding ‘open-ness’ finds absolute nothing-ness. ‘Feeling’ and ‘finding’ are also not ‘It’. Search activities cannot feel or find ‘It’ or Be ‘It’. ‘It’ is not here or there.

What Is ‘before’ any ‘thing’ Is everything. What Is ‘after’ any ‘thing’ Is everything. Everything Is nothing and then ‘It’ Is everything being nothing again. There is no ‘time’ to change. Timelessness makes the most sense which doesn’t make any sense.

What can be explained does not explain anything. What cannot be explained explains everything. If ‘It’ is about explanation then nothing can be explained clearly as nothing.

‘Not’ creating time is the greatest joy of Being effortless-ness. ‘Not’ creating time is not being bound by dimensionality. When it is all Now, where is the time? Creating time is the unnecessary adding to the clutter that obscures spaceless space. Timelessness is not retreating into the story of ‘me’, which is a character in time. True identity is free of any binding, to especially include the fraility of time and the specious-ness of a character.

What ‘Is’ just ‘Is’. There is no binding by a no one because there is no ‘other’. Every moment is full unless we deem otherwise. The effort comes in the cage called ‘effort’. Effort-ing in ‘Being’ does not make any sense. When we leave the self-imposed cage of effort there is only one activity left i.e. effortlessness. Being ‘That’ is implicit.

Life is unconditional unless we impose conditions. ‘Life’ does not need a doer or a hav-er. ‘It’ just Is. Acting on our highest joy is joy acting through Us. Our highest joy is effortlessness and Love loving Itself. ‘Love’ finds no ‘other’, as all Is Love.

There are no conditions to Life as that would be a limitation on the unlimited. To throw the effortlessness of Life aside for an effort of an over-riding ‘me’, is trade for a limitation and dis-empowerment of our highest joy and effortlessness.

Life is effortlessly open, unconditional, and our true nature without any pre-conditions to include time and effort. Be ‘That’ Now, a forevering of the Fullness Itself.


What is happening now is always happening. To make something happen from the perspective of ‘me’, is to engage in a very parochial view. ‘That’ view is as limited as a leash on an animal. Limited because the view is separate from the greater whole. This view, has a distinct separation from an integrated whole, where everything is constantly interacting with everything else all the time.

This ‘me’ of artificial separation, is a view that implicits that the world revolves around ‘it’. It suggests an independence that has no basis in fact. It suggests that actions taken on it’s behalf have no consequence other than itself. This is not only a false separation from ‘What Is’ but also an arrogance of position above everything else and everyone else.

This view is unsustainable given the selfish consequences on a victimized world seemingly supporting the ridiculous rights of an extremist. This is a view with an obvious lack of a real concern for micro/macro systems. These mutually beneficial systems, that we are all part of, have direct ramifications for the entire planet. This implicit connection is unsustainable when a micro-view is launched as a viable choice by billions of people with a needy ‘me’.

What is happening is that there is a ‘doing’ by the false self ( aka ‘me’) to engender a proper world for ‘self’. The ‘separateness’ that is obviously then present, does not ‘see’ that its separateness is unsustainable in even achieving its own goals. When the planet dies what good is excessive self-enrichment?

Actually, losing the imaginary ‘doer’, does more to ingratiate the planet than any other act. The imaginary ‘doer’ does untold harm to self and others. Seeing that there is no ‘doer’, liberates the greater good automatically. The imaginary ‘doing’ stops. The system does not require even one ‘doer’ to ‘do’ anything. Life is the system that just happens without prompting. If no person was here, the planet would go on planet-ing.

‘Doing nothing’ implies no tyrannical ‘doer’ necessary. The ‘doer’, being an invented idea with no real basis and no real existence, is a ’cause’ without a ’cause’. Identity is with ‘All that Is’ being ‘All that Is’, period. To add to ‘that’ is to actually subtract (seemingly). ‘Me’ is a concept not a real identity.

Differences are only there when perspective is relocated into a refracted self. Awakening out of the ‘me’ has no steps because ‘It Is what It Is’ already (no ‘me’).

Trying to understand ‘this’ from the ‘me’ is only allowing limitation to put more limitation unto itself. When ‘the mind’ is trying to understand, it engenders more limitation from ‘the source’ of limitation.

We Are limitless unless and until we prescribe a ‘limitedness’. There is no awakening out of ‘me’ because there never really was a ‘real’ me. Understanding comes from Being-ness not imagination trying to understand.

Be effortlessly empty of every ‘thing’. Nothing needs to be done. The ‘Nothingness’ is Everything. It Is what Is happening.


Why this is important, is to recognize the need for an explicit remembering of what is left when emotions and thoughts are not present. What is left is something often called ‘nothing’.

This ‘nothingness’ appears as nothing but yet is ‘something’. This ‘something’ cannot be described like an object can be described. Yet it is alive, as there is a knowing Presence. ‘This’ is what is essential yet invisible to the mind.

Between the coming/going of emotions and thoughts, what is present Is always present. The noting of ‘the Presence in absence’ of emotions/thoughts does not mean that this ‘Presence’ was ever absent. It only means that a seeming obfuscation occluded this ‘Presence’. The shallow adherence to an exclusivity of emotions and thoughts as a priori, is a choice that may or may not be apparent.

When we give a monopolistic deference to emotions and thoughts that fully occupy space, we clearly make a choice, either consciously or unconsciously, for ‘things’. Conversely, making a conscious choice for a practice of investigation and acknowledgement of ‘what’ is present, ‘that’ conscious choice, can easily reveal a false belief about the absence of Presence. ‘Presence’ is actually Being Here and being ‘something’, despite the presence and/or absence of appearances like emotions and thoughts (false beliefs).

Juxtaposing the conscious choice with the un-conscious choice, we see so staggeringly, what is up with the ‘un-conscious choice‘. That limited view hails to an exceedingly narrow viewpoint that Awareness is something outside of Ourselves. When in fact, through a little investigation, we find otherwise. Clarity is in the ‘Seeing’ that Awareness never is not present even when ‘seeming’ obfuscations like emotions and thoughts pre-occupy us. Awareness Is us always.

There is no rocket science being practiced Here. What is Here, with emotions/thoughts, is also always Here when there are no perceivable emotions/thoughts. When ‘we’ Are in Awareness at all times and all circumstances, there is nothing to do to then ‘try’ to get into Awareness. Limiting circumstances cannot change the “What Is”.

Belief can seemingly alter the Truth of ‘this’ unchanging reality. Beliefs are tools. They are Not Truths. Even ‘spirituality’ is a concept. Truths do not need words to validate Truth. Concepts are useful but at the same time ‘after-thoughts’. Truth is always first. Ideas are subsequent.

Between thoughts, before thoughts, after thoughts, Awareness Is unchangingly Here. Emotions/feelings come and go while the ‘open heart’ always remains ‘open’.

Feel the heart-space of unobstructed Awareness. Unobstructed by thought, emotion, habit, belief, and/or concept, the Truth of Awareness always abides in perennial Presence.

We are always in the presence of the Presence of Awareness, effortlessly Now. Quiet mind and open heart facilitate ‘What Is’ always Here Now despite any circumstances or lack of circumstances.

Be free of clinging to any ‘thing’. We Are already ‘In’. ‘That’ will never change.